NIKE HYPERVENOM PHANTOM REVIEW

Nike Hypervenom Phantom Review

When we say that the Hypervenom replaced the Total 90 range last year, it’s probably selling what Nike did a little bit short.

Rather than just renaming the boot, Nike completely refocused what this silo should be about and made a raft of changes to suit the modern attacker; ditching techy ‘power’ elements and blending speed, agility and a pure feel on the ball.

The result is one of the best boots to release in the last twelve months. Read on to find out why.

Comfort & Fit – 5/5

Nike Hypervenom Phantom Review - Comfort & Fit

Players aching for a wide-fitting speed boot, your boat has finally come in. Whilst not a speed boot in the purest sense of the word, the Nike Hypervenom Phantom is light, make no mistake, and has a very forgiving fit.

The forefoot has a pleasant level of stretch to it and the heel is deceptively soft around the collar. Couple that with a surprisingly deep lacing system and the boot accommodates just about any foot shape (bar the super-wide and super-narrow) in a true-to-size fit.

Touch & Feel – 5/5

Nike Hypervenom Phantom Review - Touch & Feel

If there’s one true revelation that comes out of the Nike Hypervenom Phantom’s design then it is the NikeSkin upper.

Built on a base of mesh, the boot is wonderfully supple and moulds around the foot in absolutely no time at all.

This soft synthetic feels absolutely nothing like a leather; but that’s no bad thing. The NikeSkin on the Hypervenom feels like nothing on any other boot on the planet.

Low profile, snug to the foot and with enough texture to add a sense of grip on the ball, the Hypervenom offers an assured touch across the whole foot.

Looks – 4/5

Certainly not for everyone, the Hypervenom is audacious. Designed for the player who wants to lace up something before a game that instills a sense of confidence and ubiquity, everything on the boot is designed to stand out.

The alien-texture NikeSkin helps assuage any sense of the boot being a little too plain by giving a bold visual identity and the double usage of the Nike Swoosh stays just the right side of gaudy.

The skull and crossbones is a little naff, though. Sorry guys.


Durability – 3/5

Nike Hypervenom Phantom Review - Durability

We’re actually in to month three of using the Hypervenoms on a multitude of surfaces with little issue.

We heard reports of early colourways being plagued with separation issues as well as straight-up tearing of the upper, but it’s a case of ‘so far, so good’ with our pair. Leaving us to presume any issues have been addressed by Nike as the boot’s lifetime has gone on.

Performance – 4/5

Nike Hypervenom Phantom Review - Performance

A one-two combo, the X1.1 last and NikeSkin upper get the upper of the boot closer to the foot than just about any other boot we’ve worn, allowing for a purity in striking and controlling the ball that’s out of this world.

The traction plate is versatile, and does the job without any fuss. You won’t notice the braking studs making a tangible difference when changing directions, but the conical studs are perfect for disengaging the turf and rotating.

A couple of negative points; the studs on the Hypervenom are very short, so that’s great for firm and hand ground pitches, but don’t go near an SG pitch in them.

Additionally, the touted split-toe design doesn’t really live up to it’s promises in any notable way – but that doesn’t stop it being a really good soleplate.

Price – 3/5

At a just-over-average £160, the Hypervenom Phantom falls into the 3/5 category. It does come with a drawstring bag, though. Which is neat.

Conclusion – 24/30

Unless you have some sort of aversion to Nike boots, there is little I could say to dissuade anyone from buying a pair of Hypervenoms.

I would say they’re at their best suited on the feet of players in the top half of the pitch as they offer very little in terms of protection; defenders would be better suited with a heftier boot like the Legend V or Nitrocharge.

But aside from that, I’m going to stick my neck out and say these might just be the best football boots Nike have ever made. Well worth your time.


Written By
More from Kyle Elliot

JERMAIN DEFOE: ADIDAS F50’S, SPURS’ NEW LOOK & THE NEW WORLD CUP BALL

Spurs & England Striker Jermain Defoe joins us on set at the...
Read More

6 Comments

  • Let’s face it…Nike didn’t replace the T90. They dropped the T90, which was more than likely selling poorly and made a bigger brother version of the Vapor, which sells well. Unfortunately I’ve also had the Hypervenoms for 3months and they’ve stretched beyond use…you can only go so tight with the laces before it looks ridiculous.

  • I just bought some T90s. I have to say that I wish Nike would have continued to make the T90s and made these as a new Silo. I like both boots but I can’t see the Hypervenom not over stretching eventually. Other wise I would agree that these are one of the best boots ever created in terms of raw performance.

  • had them for three months…. amazing boot,but material ripped off :/ 🙁 but they are much better then vapors in fit and comfort 🙂 nike returned my money,so no problem

  • Do Not buy these shoes or u will be sorry. They are defective, will not last a saeson and Nike is not honoring warranty on them.

    A bunch of kids on my sons U-16 Premier team purchased these garbage shoes last year. Not one of them made it though the season. Not one single pair. They sock part of them tore on every single pair. The strikers were the worst. At first Nike replaced them and then after a Nike rep told one of the players to have everyone send them in for replacement, then we got “notified this was now ordinary wear and tear” and they destroyed the shoes and would not send them back today, Some warranty right. I ask why they told us to return them, and how the same defect can be under warranty for some shoes and not for others when they were all purchased in same month and I might as well have been speaking to a robot. Apparently, some one just looks at them and guesses.

    The socks were full of tears on both shoes, just like all the others. I would post pictures but they claim I checked recycle on the form so they destroyed the evidence. $300.00 for a pair of shoes that will not last a single soccer season.
    Btw the shoes were won by a goalie not a striker.
    I would highly recommend avoiding these like the plague.

    I have used nothing but Nike shoes and gear for decades. (Even with Phil Knight’s ridiculous Oregon support.) However, this will be a last pair of Nike Shoes for soccer, and last product I ever buy from them. They were the ones that told me to return the shoes, they are ones that refused to honor the warranty and then destroyed the shoes. I am the one saying I have had enough of poor customer service, and outright dishonest behavior. They are more interested in backing up their inconsistent product inspectors, (Which they refused to have explain to me why he said this was wear and tear on the later pairs), then their products. They have zero interest in standing behind their product. There is clearly a serious product defect on these shoes and they know it, Time to move on.

    STEVE in Mobile

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *