Once the jewel of the Nike boot line-up, the T90 series has had a bit of a hard time recently. Since the introduction of the CTR360 line and the stunning re-invention of the Tiempo, there are now plenty of alternatives to those who want a pair of non-Vapor Nike football boots.

Does the new Nike T90 Laser IV have what it takes to re-find it’s place in the Nike stable? Let’s find out!

Comfort/Fit – 10/10

The Nike T90 Laser IV's in a review on

Gone is the roomy, wide-foot-pleasing forefoot of the Laser III, in comes a more narrow, streamlined forefoot that completely changes the dynamic of the boot.

That’s not to say these boots are about to put the squeeze on you, though; built to be the same shape as the spectacularly comfortable CTR360 II, the new Nike T90 Laser IV is a football boot that takes the series back to the ‘Air Zoom’ days, and improves the range drastically for doing so.

These are no longer going to be the ‘go-to’ football boots for players with wide feet, but those with average-to-narrow hooves are going to find a boot that is comfortable and well-fitting right out of the box.


Feel/Touch – 8/10

The forefoot of the Nike T90 Laser IV in a review on

As you can hopefully tell from the photos, after 3 weeks in the Nike T90 Laser IV, the upper has creased exceptionally, moving well with the whole of my foot and becoming soft and supple.

The result is a wonderful middle ground between the thin-but-plastic feeling of the Teijin upper on the Superfly, and the synthetic KangaLite of the CTR360 II.

It doesn’t come close to the feel of a well-worn K-leather, but for a synthetic football boot, the new Laser offers a great feel for the ball in all situations, and the new adaptive shield doesn’t ever feel like it’s in the way.


Looks – 9/10

A Pair of the Nike T90 Laser IV's Strike Zone in a review on

I know from the comments section when they were first revealed that not everyone thought the new look of the Nike T90 Laser IV was one they could dig, but I think they’re a stunning pair of boots.

The sleek, low-profile silhouette and infusion of technology into the upper is futuristic-cool at it’s best, and the little details like the embossed heel pattern add some subtlety to the distinctive launch colourway.
Maintenance – 4/10

The fins on the Nike T90 Laser IV's Strike Zone in a review on

These are a pair of football boots that were never designed to get muddy. Or even be near mud.

The fins at the front are undoubtedly one of my favourite pieces of design on these football boots, but they gather dried dirt and rubber-crumb like no other boot on the market.

As for the Nike T90 Laser IV‘s upper, things don’t get better here, either. The white sections of the boot has a gorgeous ‘veined’ effect running across it, which looks stunning out of the box. But, be warned, as soon as any muck has infiltrated this pattern, they won’t get that clean again!

Performance – 9/10

The heel of the Nike T90 Laser IV's in a review on

Nike’s three main marketing linchpins for the Nike T90 Laser IV are; improved traction, reduced weight and ‘The Perfect Strike’.

The reason I point this out, is that these three factors are the best things about the new Striker-designed boots. The re-distribution of the studs carries your weight much better than the Laser III, regardless of surface, and they also offer a very speed-focused layout for optimum confidence when bombing into the final third with or without the ball.

Combining this with the drop in weight and the improved fit, and – dare I say it – the Nike T90 Laser IV might actually be a better ‘speed’ football boot than the Superfly III!

That’s not to say the Nike T90 Laser IV are a slouch in the power department, though. The new ‘Perfect Strike’ zone is a massive improvement over the silicon pods last year, providing a universally flat plateau for shooting, no matter what the shape of your foot.

The only real disappointment in this area is the fins on the bottom of the strike zone. They’re so far out of the way, I didn’t feel they benefited my shooting technique or touch at all – though this will likely vary depending on your style.

Value – 6/10

The adaptive shield of the Nike T90 Laser IV in a review on

After giving the Umbro Geometra an 8/10 for it’s £120 price tag, it seems only fair that the Nike T90 Laser IV drops into the ‘just-above-average’ zone of 6/10 for it’s £140 RRP, saved from dropping into the ‘industry average’ (which would be a 5/10) £150 zone by being a full £15 cheaper than the comparable adiPower.

Overall – 9/10

The front of the Nike T90 Laser IV's in a review on

The new Laser feels solid, and combines the low weight that players demand at the moment, with some classic power/accuracy football boot sensibilities which are smartly integrated – much like adidas have done with the new Predator.

After fixing the Comfort and Fit issues of the Laser III (by cleverly using the CTR360’s last) the new Nike Laser IV are a difficult football boot not to recommend to the goal-grabber in your life – denied a perfect score only by the boost in price.

Written By
More from Kyle Elliot


Carrick, Llanna and Caulker are the first Puma pro's to offer up...
Read More
Join the Conversation


  1. says: jpizzo

    i don’t understand how a shot shield can move around so drastically from model to model.  First we kick with top of our foot with Lasers ii, then we have top and inside of big toes a la Laser iii, now its basically good for Mutakean (sp) or passing.  Did I miss over the past 10 years on how to kick a football?  when it moves to the back heel – i know then that Nike has been taking the mickey.  PS. miss the wide-fit…

    1. says: Karl

      I think that’s what the embossing on the heel is for 😛 35 yard Hollywood backheels across the pitch!

      Great review though, Kyle – not a Nike fan but nice to see a well though-out piece.

  2. says: Fifinho5

    looks are primarily a matter of opinion so i can understand them scoring highly there despite what most people think of these boots but i think a 9/10 score overall is being pretty generous…

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *