Comments on: THE GREAT CHAMPIONS LEAGUE FINAL DEBATE

By: ROMA FINALE 2009 : THE ITALIAN DEBATE

ROMA FINALE 2009 : THE ITALIAN DEBATE — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:22:02 +0000

Here the Italiam answer to your debate!

By: Anthony

Anthony — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:03:57 +0000

I think Rome deserves the final, the only times there has been violence has been when Roma has been playing an English team, but there are no more Italian teams in the competition! (not to say that I condone violence, but under the circumstances Rome is as good a place as any to hold the final) Fingers crossed there will be no trouble outside the stadium or anywhere else for that matter!

By: Devin

Devin — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 05:52:38 +0000

Rome absolutely does not deserve the CL Final, anywhere but Rome.

I can’t think of any possible place that is worse.

By: Workout Planet

Workout Planet — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:24:06 +0000

I think everybody deserves a second chance, but in this case no, not after what happened with Arsenal supporters recently, what happened there wasn’t the second nor the third an incident like that happened.

By: Sion

Sion — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:05:48 +0000

Whilst there has no doubt been a significant amount of organisation gone into scheduling the final for this stadium, Rome should lose the prestige of hosting the game.

1. It’s not worth the risk based on their history of violence.
2. Uefa need to use Rome as an example – behave badly, forget ‘trophy match hosting’.

By: Fenboy

Fenboy — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:02:21 +0000

If Uefa don’t move the final they are effectively condoning or at the very least, turning a blind eye to violence. Simple as that.