Comments on: KAKA “NO”, BELLAMY “YES”, ROBINHO “BYE”

By: Lionboy

Lionboy — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:01:19 +0000

Who needs Kaka
city have bellamy lol
oh and dont forget de jong
definatly worth 19 million
what are they doing?

By: martinccillo

martinccillo — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:24:32 +0000

THATS TRUE WORKOUT PLANET, I CANT SEE KAKA WITH THE MAN CITY JERSEY, A LITTLE CLUB OF ENGLAND, BUT WHAT DO YOU THINK IF THE INTERESTED CLUB WAS CHELSEA, LIVERPOOL, OR MANUTD???

By: VB

VB — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:30:32 +0000

Here’s a better article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/mancity/4300193/Manchester-City-demand-explanation-for-Robinho-flit.html

By: VB

VB — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:29:36 +0000

Kevin — I don’t think the article implies that Robinho left the club for good. Sounds like he just had a little argument with the manager and went home for a little bit. Even if he did leave for good, I feel as if he is a bit overrated anyways… They need way more class players around him for him to make an impact.

By: kevin

kevin — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:13:00 +0000

Well the kaka thing isn’t going to affect eighter team in anyway now. Robinho leaving on the other hand, that’s a major blow for man. City. Hopefully they are sucessful without him. And I would like to no more on his actions over the next few weeks..

By: Workout Planet

Workout Planet — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:46:38 +0000

I knew Kaka would stay at AC Milan, as I said in other comments here at footy boots, its now all about money when we talk about Kaka. He is one of the only brazilian players that don’t come from a poor brackground, he is not a mercenary like 97% of Brazilian players. Great decision KAKA, with all my respect to Man. City’s supporters, I don’t see Kaka playing at a club with no tradition nor international projection.