Football Boots, Soccer Shoes, Cleats or whatever you call them!

Leave a comment

Categories


columns


Wada logoFootball’s World and European governing bodies have given the thumbs down to the latest code of conduct proposed by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

In a move designed to bring football in to line with other sports such as athletics, WADA wanted football to adopt its ‘whereabouts’ code where players have provide the agency with details of their movements for at least 1 hour a day.

However in a response that has shocked WADA and will doubtless less than impress other sporting bodies, Fifa and Uefa rejected the idea saying that they wanted to “respect players’ privacy.”

Their joint statement read:

Fifa and Uefa reject Wada code Fifa and Uefa do not accept that controls be undertaken during the short holiday period of players.

Fifa and Uefa want to draw attention to the fact that, both on a political and juridical level, the legality of the lack of respect of the private life of players, a fundamental element of individual liberty, can be questioned.

Every year, the footballing world organises between 25,000 and 30,000 doping controls and is committed to fighting doping in football with all of its means.

In a spirit of collaboration in the fight against doping, Fifa and Uefa therefore ask WADA to reconsider its position on the ‘whereabouts’ rule.”

Wada responded by saying it was “surprised and concerned” by the attitude of Fifa and Uefa.

Their President, John Fahey, said:

Fifa and Uefa reject Wada code One of the key principles of efficient doping control is the surprise effect and the possibility to test an athlete without advance notice on a 365-day basis.

Alleging, as Fifa and Uefa do, that testing should only take place at training grounds and not during holiday periods, ignores the reality of doping in sport.

Experience has demonstrated that athletes who cheat seize every opportunity to do so and dope when they believe they won’t be tested.

Some substances and methods disappear quickly from the body while keeping their performance-enhancing effects. Anti-doping organizations must therefore be able to test athletes at all times in an intelligent fashion.

Wada stakeholders have recognised this reality, and the feedback we have received from the overwhelming majority of other sports, but also from athletes and all those who support doping-free sport, strongly contradicts Fifa’s and Uefa’s stance.

» Leave a comment


Bookmark with:

Similar Posts:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

3 Comments »

  • Fenboy Says:

    What a joke Fifa and Uefa are. As usual, as far as they are concerned, it’s one rule for football and another for the rest of sport.

    And the number of tests they carry out is laughable - 25,000 across the world in a calendar year. To put that in context, 5,000 tests were carried out at the Beijing Olympics in just 3 weeks.

  • Devin Says:

    i believe that fifa and uefa are right to say no.

    If they want to do it their own way, then they can do it their own way, no argument from me.

  • Fenboy Says:

    But the point is Devin is that they are not doing it.

    First off, just think how many professional players there are in the world, then divide that figure by 25,000 tests. You’ll appreciate that players aren’t getting tested enough.

    And, if Fifa get their way, players will never be tested unexpectedly.

    Hardly a foolproof, drugs testing system now is it??

  • Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)

    Football Videos


    Advertisement


    Recent Posts


    Football news

    Debate

    Which of the following football boots will have the biggest impact, both immediate and long term, in the market place?

    • adidas Predator_X (48%, 848 Votes)
    • Nike CTR360 (45%, 802 Votes)
    • PUMA v1.10 (7%, 128 Votes)

    Total Voters: 1,778

    Loading ... Loading ...


    © 2009 TH UK Network Ltd : Website by TH UK Media

    Football Boots - reviews, news, video and expert analysis on football boots. It's the home of football boots!