Comments on: ADIDAS F50 ADIZERO PRIME REVIEW http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/ Football Boots Experts - Latest boots, reviews & news. Thu, 17 May 2012 03:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Nick Sundin http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-122360 Nick Sundin Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:00:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-122360 superfly is better for shooting and traction. lightness makes very little difference because a human body will weigh much more than the boots superfly is better for shooting and traction. lightness makes very little difference because a human body will weigh much more than the boots

]]> By: Ricardo http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121929 Ricardo Sun, 22 May 2011 17:03:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121929  adizero is a lighter boot than mercurial but the upper of adizero is so thin.....it hurts and i have red in the internet that is breaks of easily so   i feel conscious when im playing....so...adizero is lightest but mercurial is the BEST.!!!    adizero is a lighter boot than mercurial but the upper of adizero is so thin…..it hurts and i have red in the internet that is breaks of easily so   i feel conscious when im playing….so…adizero is lightest but mercurial is the BEST.!!!  

]]> By: Johnny http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121542 Johnny Wed, 11 May 2011 13:08:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121542 didn't mentionn the set back for the adizeros which is quality, for Nike it's the price. didn’t mentionn the set back for the adizeros which is quality, for Nike it’s the price.

]]> By: Johnny http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121540 Johnny Wed, 11 May 2011 13:07:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121540 I'm sure a lot of people would disagree, with the adizeros the set back is price with the superfly's it's the price. A couple of ounces don't make you faster that's pure market strategy just like the be fast be seen Nike campaign. If speed was so important messi would use primes instead of leather adizeros. Primes are 300 and superfly's are 400 but I've used my superfly 1s since they came out and their still intact, bought a pair of adizeros and in a month the stud breaks off so I wouldn't mind paying 400 for a pair that will last me more than 2 seasons. I’m sure a lot of people would disagree, with the adizeros the set back is price with the superfly’s it’s the price. A couple of ounces don’t make you faster that’s pure market strategy just like the be fast be seen Nike campaign. If speed was so important messi would use primes instead of leather adizeros. Primes are 300 and superfly’s are 400 but I’ve used my superfly 1s since they came out and their still intact, bought a pair of adizeros and in a month the stud breaks off so I wouldn’t mind paying 400 for a pair that will last me more than 2 seasons.

]]> By: nicoacademia http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121537 nicoacademia Wed, 11 May 2011 07:36:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121537 I've never liked the studs for adizero - they slip too much. if they had bladed adizeros that would be perfect for me - unfortunately no review across the net mentioned this fact before my purchase. I’ve never liked the studs for adizero – they slip too much. if they had bladed adizeros that would be perfect for me – unfortunately no review across the net mentioned this fact before my purchase.

]]> By: Johnny http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121536 Johnny Wed, 11 May 2011 03:36:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121536 I myself picked up a pair of primes for $180 and the upper does seem thin just like the standard adizeros. My standard adizero's had a broken stud after a month of use and I only played on FG fields so no turf at all and adidas wouldn't switch them or replace them. Hopefully the primes are a much better pair, great review! I myself picked up a pair of primes for $180 and the upper does seem thin just like the standard adizeros. My standard adizero’s had a broken stud after a month of use and I only played on FG fields so no turf at all and adidas wouldn’t switch them or replace them. Hopefully the primes are a much better pair, great review!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121528 Anonymous Tue, 10 May 2011 16:05:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121528 @0937ccbe7c04cd4b21cabc7a4edfb0a2:disqus did u get ure usual size. like i wear size 11 in normal shoes and nike. when i tried them on the size 11 hurt but the size 12 was massive? did u try the leather ones too they fitted perfectly but they were out of my price range @0937ccbe7c04cd4b21cabc7a4edfb0a2:disqus did u get ure usual size. like i wear size 11 in normal shoes and nike. when i tried them on the size 11 hurt but the size 12 was massive? did u try the leather ones too they fitted perfectly but they were out of my price range

]]> By: IPodKiller http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121525 IPodKiller Tue, 10 May 2011 13:21:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121525 We don't want flywire, carbon soles and sense studs. We want just a light boot for the right price. And the F50/prime has showed you. Adidas is always 1 place ahead of nike. More innovatives, German quality. What do you want more? I will buy the Adipowers (hopefully in the original adidas colour) and and some fine German quality boots. 145g vs 210g and you pay more for some stupid carbon. We don’t want flywire, carbon soles and sense studs.
We want just a light boot for the right price.

And the F50/prime has showed you.
Adidas is always 1 place ahead of nike.
More innovatives, German quality. What do you want more?

I will buy the Adipowers (hopefully in the original adidas colour) and and some fine German quality boots.

145g vs 210g and you pay more for some stupid carbon.

]]> By: SirPranceAlot http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121524 SirPranceAlot Tue, 10 May 2011 13:13:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121524 Im really disappointed with the fit on this boot, I've got a pair and I can't wear them any longer then 30 mins. The synthetic is soo thin that it physically hurts your foot when you hammer the ball, this slapping sensation is cheap and lacks any form of comfort. I understand the speed/weight story but i think alot of the hype about creasing of the super thin upper and slapping on your foot is a con. Vapours are more functional. Im really disappointed with the fit on this boot, I’ve got a pair and I can’t wear them any longer then 30 mins. The synthetic is soo thin that it physically hurts your foot when you hammer the ball, this slapping sensation is cheap and lacks any form of comfort.

I understand the speed/weight story but i think alot of the hype about creasing of the super thin upper and slapping on your foot is a con. Vapours are more functional.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.footy-boots.com/adidas-f50-adizero-prime-review-16791/#comment-121522 Anonymous Tue, 10 May 2011 12:28:00 +0000 http://www.footy-boots.com/?p=16791#comment-121522 what size do people wear in synthetic because size 11 was very tight and hurt and size 12 is like loads of front space? what do i do? what size do people wear in synthetic because size 11 was very tight and hurt and size 12 is like loads of front space? what do i do?

]]>